Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Jeffrey Marten v. Superintendant D. Sauers

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


August 10, 2012

JEFFREY MARTEN,
PETITIONER,
v.
SUPERINTENDANT D. SAUERS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE : COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, RESPONDENTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jan E. Dubois, J.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 10th day of August, 2012, upon consideration of the Petition Under 28 U.S.C.. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by petitioner Jeffrey Marten (Document No. 1, filed April 29, 2011), and the related submissions of the parties, and the record in this case, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Arnold C. Rapoport dated July 13, 2012, no objections having been filed, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Arnold C. Rapoport dated July 13, 2012, is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The petition Under 28 U.S.C.. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by petitioner Jeffrey Marten is DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE without an evidentiary hearing;

3. A certificate of appealability will not issue because reasonable jurists would not debate whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right or this Court's procedural rulings with respect to petitioner's claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

BY THE COURT:

Jan E. DuBois

20120810

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.