Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In Re: Avandia Marketing

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


August 7, 2012

IN RE: AVANDIA MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Cynthia M. Rufe

THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO:

Amjad Faheem v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC No. 11-695; Marvin Rainey v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC No. 11-3031

ORDER

AND NOW, this 7th day of August 2012, upon consideration of Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment [MDL Doc. No. 1890] and Plaintiffs' Rule 56(d) Motions [MDL Doc. No. 1917] the responses and replies thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED as to all personal-injury tort claims asserted by Plaintiffs in the above-captioned cases.

2. The Motions Pursuant to Rule 56(d) are DENIED. It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.

20120807

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.