IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
August 7, 2012
IN RE: AVANDIA MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Cynthia M. Rufe
THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO:
Amjad Faheem v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC No. 11-695; Marvin Rainey v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC No. 11-3031
AND NOW, this 7th day of August 2012, upon consideration of Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment [MDL Doc. No. 1890] and Plaintiffs' Rule 56(d) Motions [MDL Doc. No. 1917] the responses and replies thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED as to all personal-injury tort claims asserted by Plaintiffs in the above-captioned cases.
2. The Motions Pursuant to Rule 56(d) are DENIED. It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.