IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
July 27, 2012
DANIEL EDWARD MEYERS, PLAINTIFF
GARY D. ALEXANDER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Chief Judge Kane
ORDER THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:
On July 9, 2012, Magistrate Judge Carlson issued a Report and Recommendation that Plaintiff Daniel Edward Meyers's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be granted and that his complaint be dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff endeavoring to correct the defects cited in the report within twenty days of any dismissal order. (Doc. No. 4.) No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed, and Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on July 19, 2012. (Doc. No. 5.)
ACCORDINGLY, on this 27th day of July 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. Magistrate Judge Carlson's Report and Recommendation that Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be granted is ADOPTED;
2. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2) is GRANTED; and
3. In light of Plaintiff's filing of an amended complaint, Magistrate Judge Carlson's recommendation that Plaintiff's complaint (Doc. No. 1) be dismissed without prejudice is deemed moot, and this matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Carlson for further proceedings.
Yvette Kane, Chief Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.