IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
July 24, 2012
RITCHIE WEBB, PLAINTIFF,
BRISTOL BOROUGH, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Anita B. Brody, J.
AND NOW, this __24th __ day of July 2012, it is ORDERED that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Doc. No. 31; Doc. No. 32) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part:
* Defendant Lebo's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 31) as to Counts IV-VI (state law claims) is GRANTED.
* Defendant Siana's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 32) as to Counts I and II (Section 1983 claims) is GRANTED.
* The remaining claims in Defendants' motions to dismiss (Doc. No 31; Doc. No. 32) are DENIED without prejudice to raise the claims again at a later stage of the litigation process.
It is further ORDERED that Defendant Gerber's supplemental motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 54) is DENIED without prejudice.
Anita B. Brody
Copies VIA ECF on _________ to: Copies MAILED on _______ to:
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.