Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In Re Flonase Antitrust Litigation

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


July 23, 2012

IN RE FLONASE ANTITRUST LITIGATION

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Anita B. Brody, J.

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO All Actions

ORDER

AND NOW, this ___23rd____ day of _July___ 2012, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum of this same date, it is ORDERED that:

* GSK's Motion to Exclude in Part the Expert Report and Testimony of Leslie Benet (No. 08-3149, ECF No. 288; No. 08-3301, ECF No. 350; No. 09-1638, ECF No. 183) is DENIED.

* Plaintiffs' Motion to Exclude the Proposed Testimony of Mary K. Pendergast (No. 08-3149, ECF No. 291; No. 08-3301, ECF No. 346*fn1 ; No. 09-1638, ECF No. 180) is DENIED.

* GSK's Motion to Exclude the Expert Report and Testimony of Rochelle Kimmel (No. 08-3149, ECF No. 290; No. 08-3301, ECF No. 351; No. 09-1638, ECF No. 184) is DENIED as moot.*fn2

The motions are denied subject to the limitations noted in the accompanying memorandum of this same date.

Anita B. Brody

Copies VIA ECF on _________ to: Copies MAILED on _______ to:


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.