IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
July 19, 2012
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
AMANJEET KAUR, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lawrence F. Stengel, J.
AND NOW, this 19th day of July, 2012, upon consideration of the defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. No. 11), the government's response in opposition (Doc. No. 12), and the defendant's reply thereto (Doc. No. 13), and following oral argument on the motion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion (Doc. No. 11) is DENIED as follows:
1. The defendant's statute of limitations, collateral estoppel, and waiver eligibility arguments are without merit and her motion for judgment on the pleadings on these issues is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE.
2. The defendant's argument that Ms. Kaur did not procure her citizenship through an illegality is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to re-raise the issue after conducting discovery.
BY THE COURT:
Lawrence F. Stengel
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.