IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
July 13, 2012
MATTHEW SCHLEGEL AND JENNIFER SCHLEGEL, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS,
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Caputo
NOW, this 13th day of July, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (Doc. 13) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:
1. Defendant's Motion is DENIED to the extent it seeks to dismiss Plaintiffs' claims under Pennsylvania's Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, 73 P.S. § 201-1 et seq.,and Pennsylvania's bad faith insurance statute, 42 Pa. C.S.A. § 8371, as predicated on unreasonable document requests;
2. Defendant's Motion is GRANTED in all other respects.
A. Richard Caputo United States District Judge
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.