IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
July 12, 2012
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lawrence F. Stengel, J.
AND NOW, this 12th day of July, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant's, Hikeem Torrence, Second Motion in Limine (Doc. No. 364), the Government's Response thereto (Doc. No. 371), and following an evidentiary hearing on Tuesday, May 15, 2012 and Wednesday, May 16, 2012 with all counsel, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:
1. The Government SHALL BE PRECLUDED from offering the photographs labeled Defendant's Exhibit A and C into evidence as they are unduly prejudicial; and
2. The Government SHALL BE PERMITTED to offer the photographs labeled as Defendant's Exhibits E, G, H, I, J, K, L and O into evidence.
BY THE COURT:
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.