Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Chaunheng Management and v. the Hartford's Twin City Fire

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


May 8, 2012

CHAUNHENG MANAGEMENT AND DAVID MOLONY, PLAINTIFFS
v.
THE HARTFORD'S TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, DOING BUSINESS AS TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, AND
THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: James Knoll Gardner United States District Judge

ORDER

NOW, this 8th day of May, 2012, upon consideration of the following documents:

(1) Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), together with Exhibits A, B, C and D, filed November 4, 2011;

(2) Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand, which opposition was filed November 18, 2011;

(3) Defendants' Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions filed December 12, 2011, together with Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants' Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions; and

(4) Plaintiffs' Answer and Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions, which answer and brief were filed December 27, 2011;

and for the reasons expressed in the accompanying Opinion,

IT IS ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion to remand is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants' motion for sanctions is denied.

BY THE COURT:

James Knoll Gardner

20120508

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.