IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
April 30, 2012
HERD CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC, P.C., RESPONDENT
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, PETITIONER
Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court
AND NOW, this 30th day of April, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is: Whether the Superior Court improperly interpreted §1797 of the MVFRL and its own case of Barnum v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 635 A.2d 155 (Pa.Super. 1993) rev'd in part by Terminato v. Pennsylvania National Ins. Co., 645 A.2d 1287 (Pa. 1994), to allow attorney's fees even when an insurer has utilized the Peer Review process?
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.