Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

City of Pittsburgh and Upmc Work Partners Clms Mgm v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Campbell

April 27, 2012

CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC WORK PARTNERS CLMS MGM, PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (CAMPBELL), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC WORK PARTNERS CLMS MGM, PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (MCHUGH), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC WORK PARTNERS CLMS MGM, PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (TRENZ), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC WORK PARTNERS CLMS MGM, PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (MOBLEY), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC WORK PARTNERS CLMS MGM, PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (JARZYNKA), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC WORK PARTNERS CLMS MGM, PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (SHUSTER), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC WORK PARTNERS CLMS MGM, PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (MARKS), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC WORK PARTNERS CLMS MGM, PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (LENNON-SPANGLER), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC WORK PARTNERS CLMS MGM, PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (KUCZYINSKI), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC WORK PARTNERS CLMS MGM, PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (UNGERMAN), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC WORK PARTNERS CLMS MGM, PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (FOUCH), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC WORK PARTNERS CLMS MGM, PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (GLAZE), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC WORK PARTNERS CLMS MGM, PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (HOWARD), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC WORK PARTNERS CLMS MGM, PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (MORAN), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC WORK PARTNERS CLMS MGM, PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (DAYTON), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC BENEFIT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (DIVOSEVIC), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC WORK PARTNERS CLMS MGM, PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (RUCKEL), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC WORK PARTNERS CLMS MGM, PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (BUCKLEY), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC WORK PARTNERS CLMS MGM, PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (BELAJAC), RESPONDENT



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dan Pellegrini, President Judge

ORDER

NOW, April 27, 2012, having considered petitioners' protective application for reargument en banc and respondents' answer, the application is denied.

BY THE COURT:

20120427

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.