Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Alfred Glaze v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of Pittsburgh

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA


April 27, 2012

ALFRED GLAZE, PETITIONER
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (CITY OF PITTSBURGH), RESPONDENT JAMES MCHUGH, PETITIONER
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (CITY OF PITTSBURGH), RESPONDENT THOMAS FOUCH, PETITIONER
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (CITY OF PITTSBURGH), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC BENEFIT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (UNGERMAN), RESPONDENT THOMAS KUCZYINSKI PETITIONER
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (CITY OF PITTSBURGH), RESPONDENT JOHN TRENZ, PETITIONER
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (CITY OF PITTSBURGH), RESPONDENT KENNETH RUCKEL, PETITIONER
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (CITY OF PITTSBURGH), RESPONDENT THEODORE BELAJAC, PETITIONER
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (CITY OF PITTSBURGH), RESPONDENT JOHN A. MARKS, PETITIONER
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (CITY OF PITTSBURGH), RESPONDENT JOHN UNGERMAN, PETITIONER
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (CITY OF PITTSBURGH), RESPONDENT ROBERT SHUSTER, PETITIONER
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (CITY OF PITTSBURGH), RESPONDENT JAMES HOWARD, PETITIONER
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (CITY OF PITTSBURGH), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC BENEFIT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (SHUSTER), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC BENEFIT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (FOUCH), RESPONDENT LEROY MOBLEY, PETITIONER
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (CITY OF PITTSBURGH), RESPONDENT JOSEPH BUCKLEY, PETITIONER
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (CITY OF PITTSBURGH), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC BENEFIT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (GLAZE), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC BENEFIT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (TRENZ), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC BENEFIT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (HOWARD), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC BENEFIT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (DIVOSEVIC), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC BENEFIT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (MCHUGH), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC BENEFIT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (JARZYNKA), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC BENEFIT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (LENNON-SPANGLER), RESPONDENT LUCIA LENNON-SPANGLER, PETITIONER
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (CITY OF PITTSBURGH), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC BENEFIT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (MORAN), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC BENEFIT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (MOBLEY), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC BENEFIT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (DAYTON), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC BENEFIT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (MARKS), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC BENEFIT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (KUCZYINSKI), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC BENEFIT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (RUCKEL), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC BENEFIT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (BELAJAC), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC BENEFIT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (BUCKLEY), RESPONDENT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC BENEFIT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., PETITIONERS
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (CAMPBELL), RESPONDENT ROBERT MORAN, PETITIONER
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (CITY OF PITTSBURGH), RESPONDENT MICHAEL DAYTON, PETITIONER
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (CITY OF PITTSBURGH), RESPONDENT DAVID DIVOSEVIC, PETITIONER
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (CITY OF PITTSBURGH), RESPONDENT JEFFREY CAMPBELL, PETITIONER
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (CITY OF PITTSBURGH), RESPONDENT

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dan Pellegrini, President Judge

ORDER

NOW, April 27, 2012, having considered respondents' application for reargument en banc and the answers filed by designated petitioner City of Pittsburgh and respondent UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc., the application is denied.

BY THE COURT:

20120427

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.