UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
April 24, 2012
DAWN MARIE BALL,
LT. BOWER, ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: (Chief Judge Kane)
(Magistrate Judge Carlson)
ORDER THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:
Defendants filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings on January 25, 2012, arguing that Plaintiff failed to exhaust her administrative remedies. (Doc. No. 53.) On March 22, 2012, Magistrate Judge Carlson issued a Report and Recommendation in which he recommended that Defendants' motion be denied. (Doc. No. 67.) Defendants have failed to object to the motion. Upon a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation, the Court detects no error therein.
ACCORDINGLY, on this 24th day of April 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 67) is ADOPTED and Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. No. 53) is DENIED. This matter shall be referred back to Magistrate Judge Carlson for continued pre-trial management.
Yvette Kane, Chief Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.