Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Lindsay Fleck v. Wilmac Corporation

March 27, 2012

LINDSAY FLECK, PLAINTIFF,
v.
WILMAC CORPORATION, WILMAC MEDICAL INSURANCE PLAN, ATTLEBORO ASSOCIATES, LTD., ATTLEBORO NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER, AND SUSAN MITCHELL, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Ronald L. Buckwalter, S.J.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 27thday of March, 2012, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 22), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition (Docket No. 23), and Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Response in Opposition (Docket No. 24), it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 22) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:

1. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment related to Plaintiff's claims under the ADA is GRANTED to the extent the claim is based upon Defendants' alleged issuance of a written disciplinary notice to Plaintiff;

2. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment related to Plaintiff's claims under the FMLA is GRANTED to the extent the claim is based upon Defendants' alleged issuance of a written disciplinary notice to Plaintiff;

3. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED in all other respects.

It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

Ronald L. Buckwalter

20120327

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.