Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Robert and Barbara Latimore v. Redevelopment Authority of the City of Philadelphia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


March 27, 2012

ROBERT AND BARBARA LATIMORE, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Robert F. Kelly Senior Judge

ORDER AND NOW, this 27th day of March, 2012, upon consideration of the following: the Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Redevelopment Authority of the City of Philadelphia; Plaintiffs' Response by Robert and Barbara Latimore; Defendant's Reply to Plaintiffs' Response; and matters of public record, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 4) is GRANTED because Plaintiffs' Section 1983 claims are time-barred since they did not exercise their right to sue within the applicable two-year time period from the date that they knew or should have known of an injury.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs will not be permitted an opportunity to amend their Complaint because doing so would be futile in light of the untimeliness of their Complaint.

BY THE COURT:

Robert F. Kelly

20120327

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.