Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Dr. Manhua Mandy Lin v. Rohm and Haas Company D/B/A Dow Advanced Materials

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


March 26, 2012

DR. MANHUA MANDY LIN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY D/B/A DOW ADVANCED MATERIALS, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: William H. Yohn Jr., Judge

ORDER

AND NOW, this 26th day of March, 2012, upon careful consideration of defendant Rohm and Haas Company's motion to dismiss plaintiff Dr. Manhua Mandy Lin's complaint (document no. 10), Dr. Lin's opposition thereto, and Rohm and Haas's reply, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:

1. Rohm and Haas's motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to count I, alleging retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, but only insofar as the retaliation claims are based on the 2003 discovery requests. The motion is DENIED as to count I with respect to retaliation claims arising out of subsequent events.

2. Rohm and Haas's motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to count II, alleging retaliation in violation of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, but only insofar as the retaliation claims are based on the 2003 discovery requests. The motion is DENIED as to count II with respect to retaliation claims arising out of subsequent events.

3. Rohm and Haas's motion to dismiss is DENIED as to count III, alleging breach of contract.

4. Rohm and Haas's motion to dismiss is DENIED as to count IV, alleging intentional interference with prospective contractual relations.

William H. Yohn Jr.

20120326

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.