Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Southco, Inc. v. Fivetech Technology Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


March 23, 2012

SOUTHCO, INC.
v.
FIVETECH TECHNOLOGY INC.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Mary A. McLAUGHLIN, J.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 2012, for the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing today's date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Upon consideration of the defendant's Objections and Motion to Strike Exhibits N and O From the Declaration of Antranig Baronian, the Declaration of Paul Soldo, and Portions of the Declaration of John D. Pratt, Ph.D., P.E. in Support of Southco, Inc.'s Opposition to Fivetech Technology Inc.'s Motion (Docket No. 159), the opposition and reply thereto, and following oral argument on February 28, 2012, this motion is DENIED.

2. Upon consideration of the defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of Claims 16 and 17 of U.S. Patent No. 5,851,095 (Docket No. 141), the opposition and reply thereto, and following oral argument held on February 28, 2012, this motion is GRANTED. Judgment is hereby ENTERED in favor of the above-named defendant and against the plaintiff on these claims.

BY THE COURT:

Mary A. McLaughlin

20120323

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.