The opinion of the court was delivered by: Arthur J. Schwab United States District Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF UNDER 28 U.S.C. ' 2255 (DOC. NO. 423)
In this criminal action, Petitioner, Paul Schwartz, who previously pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute and receive child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(b)(1) and was sentenced to a term of 84 months of imprisonment followed by lifetime supervised release, filed a pro se Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct a Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See doc. no. 423 in criminal case file. In his Petition, Schwartz primarily alleges that while on bond, his freedom was significantly curtailed. Id. Because of this, and because he cooperated so completely with the Government while on bond, Schwartz contends that this Court should order that his "bond time" count toward his term of imprisonment of 84 months. Id.
The Court will deny Petitioner's Motion and will not hold an evidentiary hearing for the reasons set forth and explained more fully below.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
On March 28, 2011, Schwartz pled guilty to the crime of conspiracy to distribute and receive child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(b)(1). This Court sentenced Schwartz the same day to an 84-month term of imprisonment, followed by lifetime supervised release for his role in the conspiracy.
Schwartz and his legal counsel signed a plea agreement with the Government prior to the hearing held on March 28, 2011. In the plea agreement, the Government agreed to move to dismiss Count One of the Indictment -- which charged Schwartz with the crime of engaging in a child exploitation enterprise in violation of Chaper 10 of Title 18 -- if Schwartz pled guilty to Count Two of the indictment, but acknowledged responsibility for conduct charged in Count One and agreed that his conduct in Count One be considered by this Court in considering an appropriate sentence.
Schwartz's plea agreement with the Government states in pertinent part:
2. He acknowledges his responsibility for the conduct charged in Count One of the Superseding Indictment at Criminal No. 09-292 and stipulates that the conduct charged in that Count may be considered by the Probation Office or by the Court in calculating the guideline range and in imposing sentence.
8. Paul Schwartz waives the right to take a direct appeal from his conviction or sentence under 28 U.S.C. §1291 or 18 U.S.C. §3742, subject to the following exceptions:
(a) If the United States appeals from the sentence, Paul Schwartz may take a direct appeal from the sentence.
(b) If (1) the sentence exceeds the applicable statutory limits set forth in the United States Code, or (2) the sentence unreasonably exceeds the guideline range determined by the Court under the Sentencing Guidelines, Paul Schwartz may take a direct appeal from the sentence.
Paul Schwartz further waives the right to file a motion to vacate sentence, under 28 U.S.C. §2255, attacking his conviction or sentence, and the right to file any other collateral ...