Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Nicholas Diflorio v. Scott Kleckner

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


March 6, 2012

NICHOLAS DIFLORIO
v.
SCOTT KLECKNER, ET AL.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Timothy J. Savage, J.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 6th day of March, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant Aramark Sports, LLC's ("Aramark") Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 18), the plaintiff's response and the defendant's reply, it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as follows:

1. To the extent the motion seeks judgment in favor of the defendant Aramark on the plaintiff's discrimination claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, it is GRANTED;

2. To the extent the motion seeks judgment in favor of the defendant Aramark on the plaintiff's retaliation claim, it is DENIED.

Timothy J. Savage

20120306

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.