IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
March 6, 2012
ROOSEVELT BANKS, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
KMART CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lawrence F. Stengel, J.
AND NOW, this 6th day of March, 2012, upon careful consideration of the plaintiffs' motion to remand (Doc. No. 4), the defendants' response thereto (Doc. No. 6), and the plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a reply (Doc. No. 10), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The plaintiffs' motion to remand (Doc. No. 4) is DENIED.
2. The plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a reply (Doc. No. 10) is DENIED as moot.
BY THE COURT:
Lawrence F. Stengel
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.