Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

George Hill and David Ellis v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


February 28, 2012

GEORGE HILL AND DAVID ELLIS
v.
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Thomas N. O'neill, Jr., J.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 2012, upon consideration of the motions in limine of Ellis and SEPTA and the parties' responses thereto, it is ORDERED that SEPTA's motion is GRANTED with respect to:

1) Darlene Godwin's opinion that Joseph Rollo is racially prejudiced;

2) Denise Greene's testimony concerning Rollo's statements from 1996 or 1997;

3) Bobby Davis's hearsay testimony;

4) Reginald Goldston's hearsay testimony;

5) Carlos Ortiz's testimony concerning Rollo's statements from an unknown time; and

6) Jeffrey Brooks's testimony.

SEPTA's motion is DENIED in all other respects.

It is further ORDERED that Ellis's motion is GRANTED with respect to the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review. Judgment on Ellis's motion with respect to the arbitration award is reserved. Ellis is directed to submit a copy of the arbitration award prior to trial.

Thomas N. O'Neill, Jr.

20120228

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.