IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
February 27, 2012
KENNETH MALIK MILLER,
R.M. LAWLER, SUPERINTENDENT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner
AND NOW, this 27th day of February, 2012, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Malachy E. Mannion (Doc. 84) recommending that (1) defendant Riscigno's motion to dismiss be granted and (2) the Corrections Defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted, and, following an independent review of the record, it appearing that neither party has objected to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, and that there is no clear error on the face of the record,*fn1 see Nara v. Frank, 488 F.3d 187, 194 (3d Cir. 2007) (explaining that "failing to timely object to [a report and recommendation] in a civil proceeding may result in forfeiture of de novo review at the district court level"), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 84) of Magistrate Judge Mannion are ADOPTED.
2. Defendant Riscigno's motion to dismiss (Doc. 42) is GRANTED.
3. Corrections Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 47) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter JUDGMENT in favor of defendants and against plaintiff.
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this matter.
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge