IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
February 23, 2012
SUPERINTENDENT SAUERS, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lawrence F. Stengel, J.
ORDER AND NOW, this 23rd day of February, 2012, upon careful and independentconsideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. No. 1), the Response thereto (Doc. No. 7), and Petitioner's Reply and Motion to Stay (Doc. No. 10), and after review of the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa (Doc. No. 13), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.*fn1
2. The petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice.
3. The Motion to Stay is DENIED.
4. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL