IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
February 10, 2012
CRAIG FRAZIER, PLAINTIFF,
EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Mitchell S. Goldberg, J.
AND NOW, this 10th day of February, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant, Exide Technologies, "Motion to Dismiss In Part" (Doc. No. 9) and Plaintiff's response thereto, and for reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's motion is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART as follows:
1. Defendant's motion regarding Plaintiff's national origin and retaliation claims (Count I) is DENIED; and
2. Defendant's motion regarding Plaintiff's intentional infliction of emotional distress claim (Count II) is GRANTED.
BY THE COURT:
Mitchell S. Goldberg
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.