IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
January 11, 2012
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ET AL.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Stewart Dalzell
AND NOW, this 11th day of January, 2012, upon consideration of plaintiff's complaint (docket entry # 1), defendant City of Philadelphia's (the "City") motion to dismiss (docket entry # 4), and plaintiff's response thereto (docket entry # 6), and in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The City's motion to dismiss (docket entry # 4) is GRANTED IN PART;
2. Count II of the complaint is DISMISSED against all defendants;
3. Plaintiff is GRANTED LEAVE to file an amendment to cure defects in Counts I and III by January 25, 2012, or we will dismiss with prejudice these Counts against the City for failure to state a claim; and
4. By January 25, 2012, Plaintiff shall SHOW GOOD CAUSE why we should not dismiss without prejudice his claims against the John Doe officer defendants pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).
BY THE COURT:
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.