Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Jeffery Lee Bosold v. Warden

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


December 28, 2011

JEFFERY LEE BOSOLD
v.
WARDEN, SCI-SOMERSET, ET AL.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: John R. Padova, J.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 28th day of December, 2011, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 9), and all documents filed in connection therewith, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:

1. The Motion is DENIED insofar as it seeks dismissal of this action for improper venue pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3).

2. The Motion is DENIED insofar as it seeks to transfer this action to the Middle or Western District of Pennsylvania pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).

3. The Motion is GRANTED insofar as it seeks dismissal of this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Count I of the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to Plaintiff's claim, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for violation of his rights under the Fourth and Fifth Amendment and under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Count II of the Amended Complaint is also DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

4. Plaintiff may file a second amended complaint within 20 days of the date of this Order asserting a claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 for violation of his Eighth Amendment right to be free of cruel and unusual punishment.

BY THE COURT:

John R. Padova

20111228

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.