IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
December 20, 2011
SOLANGE CHADDA, PLAINTIFF,
TERRY MAGADY, ET. AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J.
ORDER AND NOW, this _____ day of December, 2011, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and Amended Complaint (Doc. 5, 10), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and DECREED that Defendants' Motion is GRANTED and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Relief (Doc. 6) is GRANTED
in part and DENIED in part. The Court shall restrict the injunction to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania only. Plaintiff and any entity acting on her behalf is therefore enjoined from filing any actions in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania including any further papers or actions pertaining to the Property and/or Defendants listed in this matter without first obtaining leave of this Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, as follows:
1. Plaintiff's Motion to Hire a Lawyer (Doc. 7) is Denied as Moot.
2. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant's Motion (Doc. 8) is Denied as Moot.
3. Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is Stricken from the record and will not be considered by this Court due to Plaintiff's failure to obtain leave of court under Fed. Rules of Civil Procedure 15 (a)(2).
4. Plaintiff's Motion to Have an Attorney (Doc. 12) is Denied because said motion is a duplicative of the above motion (Doc. 8).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark the case CLOSED for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT: Petrese B. Tucker _
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.