Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ingerman Affordable Housing, Inc., the Ingerman Group, and Chatham v. Margolis Edelstein and Walter

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT


December 7, 2011

INGERMAN AFFORDABLE HOUSING, INC., THE INGERMAN GROUP, AND CHATHAM APARTMENT ASSOCIATES, L.P. BY AND THROUGH THEIR ASSIGNEE, OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY AND INGERMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. BY AND THROUGH ITS ASSIGNEE, OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY AND OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY IN ITS OWN RIGHT, PETITIONERS
v.
MARGOLIS EDELSTEIN AND WALTER J. TIMBY, III, ESQUIRE AND TRANSAMERICAN INSURANCE GROUP AND THE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

Per curiam.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 7th day of December 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner are:

(1) Did the Superior Court err in finding that [petitioners] failed to establish sufficient facts of record to create a factual dispute to be determined by a jury that they were damaged by Walter J. Timby, III, Esquire and Margolis Edelstein?

(2) Did the Superior Court err in finding that [petitioners] failed to establish sufficient facts of record to create a factual dispute to be determined by a jury that the harm suffered was caused by Walter J. Timby, III, Esquire and Margolis Edelstein?

[436 EAL 2011]

20111207

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.