IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
November 30, 2011
CARLOS MERCED PLAINTIFF,
GEMSTAR GROUP, INC. , ET AL. DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J.
AND NOW, this _____ day of November, 2011, upon consideration of Defendants' Margraf, S.P.A., Margraf Tiles, S.R.L., and Linea Marmo, S.P.A ("Margraf Defendants", collectively) Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 30, 31, 32), Defendant Gemstar Canada Inc.'s Response (Doc. 37), Defendant Zim Integrated Shipping Services, Ltd.'s Response (Doc. 38), Plaintiff's Response (Doc. 39), Defendants' SDS Global Logistics, Inc. and Security Delivery Service, Inc. Response (Doc. 44), and the Margraf Defendants' Reply (Doc. 50), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and DECREED that the Margraf Defendants' Motions to Dismiss are DENIED.*fn1
BY THE COURT:
Petrese B. Tucker