IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
November 28, 2011
PAUL BENTZLEY PLAINTIFF,
MEDTRONIC, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Eduardo C. Robreno, J.
AND NOW, this 28th day of November, 2011, it is hereby ORDERED that:
(1) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 36) is GRANTED as to Counts I, II, III, IV, VI, VII, VIII, and IX and DENIED as to Count V of the Amended Complaint.
(2) Counts I, II, III, IV, VI, VII, VIII, and IX are DISMISSED;
(3) Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Surreply (ECF No. 41) is DENIED as moot; and
(4) Defendants' Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Memorandum (ECF No. 43) is DENIED as moot.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
Eduardo C. Robreno
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.