IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
November 10, 2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
KEVIN ALAN BONNER
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Arthur J. Schwab United States District Judge
MEMORANDUM ORDER RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RETROACTIVE APPLICATION OF SENTENCING GUIDELINES TO CRACK COCAINE OFFENSE 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (DOC. NO. 65)
Presently before this Court is Defendant, Kevin Alan Bonner's Motion for Retroactive Application of Sentencing Guidelines to Crack Cocaine Offense pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582. Doc. No. 65. Defendant was sentenced before this Court on April 28, 2006 to a term of imprisonment of 180 months for the possession with intent to distribute five grams or more of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B). Doc. No. 52. Defendant's present Motion argues that his sentence should be reduced because the United States Sentencing Commission (as approved by Congress and made retroactive effective March 3, 2008) amended the United States Sentencing Guidelines, §2D1.1 to decrease the offense levels applicable to specific weights of cocaine base. Doc. No. 65.
Defendant's original guidelines sentencing range was 262 to 327 months imprisonment based in part upon his status as a "career offender."*fn1 At sentencing and based upon the entirety of the circumstances, this Court found that Defendant's classification as a "career offender" was "at least somewhat overstated" and the "100 to 1 crack to powder cocaine sentencing disparity is a factor" that was considered. Doc. No. 50, 3. Therefore, using the guidelines sentencing range based upon Defendant's "career offender" status, the Court varied from the guidelines range and sentenced Defendant to 180 months.
A District Court is authorized to reduce a sentence previously imposed when: (1) the defendant's initial sentence is "based on" a sentencing range that has been lowered by the United States Sentencing Commission and (2) the sentence reduction is consistent with the United States Sentencing Commission's applicable policy statement. United States v. Doe, 564 F.3d 305, 309, cert. denied, 130 S.Ct. 563 (2009). Here, Defendant's initial sentence was "based on" a sentencing range reflecting his status as a "career offender" and not based upon the guidelines that were subsequently modified to reflect the disparity between crack and powder cocaine. Doc. No. 50. Therefore, Defendant's initial sentence will not be reduced. See United States v. Mateo, 560 F.3d 152, 155 (3d Cir. 2009).
AND NOW, this 10th day of November 2011, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Retroactive Application of Sentencing Guidelines to Crack Cocaine Offense pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (Doc. No. 65) is DENIED.
Arthur J. Schwab
cc: All Registered ECF Counsel and Parties