Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

P.V., A Minor, By and Through His Parents, Pedro v. the School District of Philadelphia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


October 31, 2011

P.V., A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HIS PARENTS, PEDRO VALENTIN AND YOLANDA CRUZ, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA, ET AL. DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Legrome D. Davis, J.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 31st day of October, 2011, upon consideration of (1) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 11), (2) Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 17), (3) Defendants' Motion for Leave to File a Reply Brief in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint (Doc. No. 21), (4) Reply Brief in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 21-1), (5) Motion by Defendants to Strike Class Action Allegations (Doc. No. 12), (6) Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Motion to Strike Class Action Allegations (Doc. No. 18), (7) Defendants' Motion for Leave to File a Reply Brief in Support of Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Class Action Allegations (Doc. No. 22), and (8) Reply Brief in Support of Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Class Action Allegations (Doc. No. 22-2), and in accordance with the reasoning set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. Defendants' Motion for Leave to File a Reply Brief in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint (Doc. No. 21) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Doc. No. 21-1 as "Reply Brief in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss."

2. Defendants' Motion for Leave to File a Reply Brief in Support of Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Class Action Allegations (Doc. No. 22) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Doc. No. 22-2 as "Reply Brief in Support of Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Class Action Allegations."

3. Defendants' Motion to Strike Class Action Allegations (Doc. No. 12) is DENIED.

4. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 11) is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

Legrome D. Davis

20111031

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.