Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Martin Gross v. R.T. Reynolds

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


September 22, 2011

MARTIN GROSS, PLAINTIFF
v.
R.T. REYNOLDS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lawrence F. Stengel, J.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 22nd day of September, 2011, upon careful consideration of defendants' motions to dismiss (Document Nos. 36, 38, and 48), plaintiff's briefs in opposition to the motions to dismiss (Document Nos. 49 and 51), and defendant's reply brief (Document No. 52), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' motions to dismiss (Document Nos. 36 and 48) are GRANTED, the Court having declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's breach of contract claim asserted in Count Two of the Amended Complaint.

2. Defendants' motion to dismiss (Document No. 38) is DISMISSED as moot.

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED.

BY THE COURT:

Lawrence F. Stengel

20110922

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.