The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gene E.K. Pratter United States District Judge
AND NOW, this 8th day of September, 2011, upon consideration of the Motion for Final Approval of Settlement (Docket No. 30) and following a final fairness hearing on September 6, 2011, in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED as outlined in this Order and the accompanying Memorandum.
Based on the Court's review of the proposed Confidential Stipulation of Settlement and the submissions of the parties, and having conducted a hearing on the matter, the Court determines as follows:
1. This action satisfies the applicable prerequisites for class action treatment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(a) and (b). The class as defined in the Confidential Stipulation of Settlement (the "Class") is so numerous that joinder of all members is not practicable, there are questions of law and fact common to the Class, the claims of the Class Representative are typical of the claims of the Class, and the Class Representative will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the Class. Questions of law and fact common to the members of the Class predominate over any questions affecting only individual members, and a class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy.
2. Notice to the Class required by Rule 23(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure has been provided in accordance with the Court's Preliminary Approval Order, and such Notice by mail has been given in an adequate and sufficient manner; constitutes the best notice practicable under the circumstances; and satisfies Rule 23(e) and due process.
3. The Defendant has timely filed notification of this settlement with the appropriate federal officials pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 ("CAFA"), 28 U.S.C. § 1715. The Court has reviewed such notification and accompanying materials, and finds that the Defendant's notification complies fully with the applicable requirements of CAFA.
4. The Confidential Stipulation of Settlement was arrived at as a result of arms'-length negotiations conducted in good faith by counsel for the parties, and is supported by the class representative.
5. The settlement as set forth in the Confidential Stipulation of Settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate to the members of the Class in light of the complexity, expense and duration of litigation and the risks involved in establishing liability, damages and in maintaining the class action through trial and appeal.
6. This action satisfies the applicable prerequisites for collective action treatment under the FLSA. Appropriate "opt-in" language was provided in the Settlement Notice and the members of the collective action are "similarly situated."
7. Thirty class members have excluded themselves from the Class in accordance with the provisions of the Preliminary Approval Order. Moreover, any individuals who did not specifically opt in have excluded themselves from the FLSA collective action.
8. The parties and each Class Member have irrevocably submitted to the exclusive jurisdiction of this Court for any suit, action, proceeding or dispute arising out of the Confidential Stipulation of Settlement.
9. It is in the best interests of the parties and the Class Members and consistent with principles of judicial economy that any dispute between any Class Member (including any dispute as to whether any person is a Class Member) and any Defendant Releasee (as defined by the Confidential Stipulation of Settlement) which in any way relates to the applicability or scope of the Confidential Stipulation of Settlement or the Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal should be presented exclusively to this Court for resolution by this Court.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
1. This action is finally certified as a class action against Aramark on behalf of a ...