IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
August 31, 2011
EARL RUHL, PLAINTIFF
COUNTY OF LANCASTER, DEFENDANT
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lawrence F. Stengel, J.
AND NOW, this 31st day of August, 2011, upon careful consideration of the defendant's motion for summary judgment (Document No. 22), the plaintiff's response thereto (Document No. 29), and the defendant's reply (Document No. 32), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The motion is GRANTED.
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
Lawrence F. Stengel
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.