Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Adranih Ernay, Adrian Ernay, Wendell Wesley, Otis Ragland, and Linda v. Chris Swatski

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


August 9, 2011

ADRANIH ERNAY, ADRIAN ERNAY, WENDELL WESLEY, OTIS RAGLAND, AND LINDA FAUST, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
CHRIS SWATSKI, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jan E. Dubois, J.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 9th day of August 2011, upon consideration of Defendant Swatski's Motion for Reconsideration (Document No. 19, filed July 28, 2011), for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum dated August 9, 2011, Defendant Swatski's Motion for Reconsideration is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as follows:

1. The motion is GRANTED with respect to defendant's request that the Court rule on his claim of qualified immunity based on his belief that a parole absconder was at plaintiffs' property the day that he and other agents under his supervision searched plaintiffs' apartments. The Court RULES that defendant is not entitled to qualified immunity on this ground; and

2. Defendant's motion is DENIED in all other respects.

BY THE COURT:

Hon. Jan E. DuBois

20110809

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.