Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In Re Flonase Antitrust v. Smithkline Beecham

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


July 14, 2011

IN RE FLONASE ANTITRUST
LITIGATION ALL ACTIONS
ROXANE LABORATORIES, INC., PLAINTIFF,
v.
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM
CORPORATION D/B/A
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Anita B. Brody, J.

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

ORDER

AND NOW, this_14th ___ day of July 2011, it is ORDERED that Defendant SmithKline Beecham Corp. d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline's Motion for Summary Judgment on Causation Grounds (No. 08-3149 (Direct), ECF No. 150; No. 08-3301 (Indirect), ECF No. 272; No. 09-1638 (Roxane), ECF No. 97) is DENIED.

Copies VIA ECF on to: Copies MAILED on to:

20110714

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.