IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
June 15, 2011
JUSTIN M. HICKOX,
CENTRE DAILY TIMES, ROBERT HEISSE, AND SARAH GANIM, DEFENDANTS
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner
AND NOW, this 15th day of June, 2011, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson (Doc. 37), recommending that defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 25) be granted, and, following an independent review of the record, it appearing that neither party has objected to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, and that there is no clear error on the face of the record,*fn1 see Nara v. Frank, 488 F.3d 187, 194 (3d Cir. 2007) (explaining that "failing to timely object to [a report and recommendation] in a civil proceeding may result in forfeiture of de novo review at the district court level"), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carlson (Doc. 37) are ADOPTED.
2. Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 25) is GRANTED without prejudice to plaintiff pursuing his claims in the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas.
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this matter.
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge