Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Kenneth Winston Ashford v. Mike Wenerowicz the District Attorney of the County of New York

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


May 27, 2011

KENNETH WINSTON ASHFORD
PETITIONER,
v.
MIKE WENEROWICZ THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, RESPONDENTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jan E. Dubois, J.

ORDER AND NOW this 27th day of May, 2011, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 filed by petitioner, Kenneth Winston Ashford (Document No. 1, filed March 9, 2010), and the record in this case, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter dated March 29, 2011, no objections having been filed, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter dated March 29, 2011, is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 filed by petitioner, Kenneth Winston Ashford, is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1404(a) and 2241(d); and,

3. A certificate of appealability will not issue because reasonable jurists would not debate this Court's procedural ruling as required under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

BY THE COURT:

Jan E. DuBois

20110527

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.