IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
May 23, 2011
DUANE REOTT AND PATTY REOTT, HUSBAND AND WIFE
ASIA TREND, INC., CLAM CORPORATION (AS SUCCESSOR-IN- INTEREST TO USL OUTDOOR PRODUCTS, INC.), USL OUTDOOR PRODUCTS, INC., REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, INC., RA BRANDS, LLC AND THE SPORTSMAN'S GUIDE PETITION OF: ASIA TREND, INC., REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, INC., RA BRANDS, LLC AND THE SPORTSMAN'S GUIDE
Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court
AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as phrased by petitioners, are:
1. Did the Superior Court err in its determination that the assertion of highly reckless conduct is an affirmative defense contrary to prior decisions of this Court and of the Superior Court which classify such assertion as a denial of causation?
2. Did the Superior Court err in its determination to expand the requirements for proof of highly reckless conduct in contravention of prior decisions of that same [c]court?
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.