Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Lionel Franks v. Temple University
April 25, 2011
LIONEL FRANKS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Berle M. Schiller,J.
AND NOW, this 25thday of April, 2011, upon consideration of Defendant Temple University's Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff's response thereto, and for the reasons stated in this Court's Memorandum dated April 25, 2011, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Defendant's Motion (Document No. 10) is GRANTED.
2. Count II of the Complaint, asserting a vicarious liability claim against Temple University, is DISMISSED.
3. Temple University is DISMISSED as a party to this action.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...