Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Frederick Banks v. S. Sager

April 21, 2011

FREDERICK BANKS,
PLAINTIFF
v.
S. SAGER, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS



The opinion of the court was delivered by: (Judge Conner)

AND NOW, this 21st day of April, 2011, upon preliminary consideration of plaintiff's Bivens*fn1 civil rights action*fn2 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, in which he alleges that named defendants mishandled two boxes of his personal property during and after transport from one facility to another, were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs, engaged in a conspiracy and violated various federal regulations, and it appearing that he seeks to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2), 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and it further appearing that the "three strikes" provision of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996 ("PLRA"), codified at 28 U.S.C. § 1915, prohibits him from proceeding in forma pauperis as he has had three prior actions or appeals dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failing to state a viable claim*fn3 , and it further appearing that there is no indiction that plaintiff "is under imminent serious physical injury," 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (setting forth the three strikes rule which provides that an inmate who has three prior actions or appeals dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failing to state a viable claim may not proceed in forma pauperis "unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury"); see also Abdul-Akbar v. McKelvie, 239 F.3d 307, 312 (3d Cir. 2001) (en banc), it is hereby ORDERED that:

ORDER

1. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is DENIED.

2. Plaintiff's complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

4. Any appeal from this order is DEEMED frivolous and not in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge

Given his litigiousness, it is not surprising that Plaintiff sometimes files duplicative or repetitious lawsuits. Banks v. County of Allegheny, 568 F. ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.