IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
April 6, 2011
DET. SNEATH, ET AL., DEFENDANTS
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner
AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 2011, upon consideration of plaintiff's motion in limine (Doc. 82), and plaintiff's motion to deem his motion in limine as unopposed (Doc. 88), and it appearing that plaintiff seeks to prohibit defendants from producing certain documentary evidence at trial based upon their failure to comply with his request for production of documents (Doc. 83), it is hereby
1. Plaintiff's motion to deem his motion in limine as unopposed (Doc. 88) is GRANTED based upon defendants' failure to oppose the motion in accordance with Local Rule 7.6.
2. The motion in limine (Doc. 82) is DENIED with respect to defendants' responses to document production requests 1-2 (Doc. 83-1, at 7) and 5-6 (Doc. 83-1, at 8-9), as the responses to the requests are deemed adequate.
3. The motion in limine (Doc. 82) is CONDITIONALLY DENIED with respect to defendants' responses to document production requests 3 and 4 (Doc. 83-1, at 8). Defendants are afforded fifteen days from the date of this order to provide to plaintiff responses to these requests. *fn1 Failure to do so will result in the motion being granted with respect to the documents related to these requests.
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge