IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
March 29, 2011
JOHN D. PETTINEO, PLAINTIFF,
GE MONEY BANK, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Berle M. Schiller, J.
AND NOW, this 29thday of March, 2011, upon consideration of Defendant GE Money Bank's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, Plaintiff's Response thereto, and for the reasons stated in this Court's Memorandum dated March 29, 2011, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion (Document No. 22) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows:
1. Defendant's Motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's claim for discrimination under 15 U.S.C. § 1691(a)(3).
2. Defendant's Motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's claims for punitive damages and attorneys' fees.
3. Defendant's Motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's remaining claims, which are DISMISSED with prejudice.
BY THE COURT:
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.