IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
March 23, 2011
BROWN & BROWN, INC., BROWN & BROWN OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC. AND GRINSPEC, INC. PLAINTIFFS,
ROBERT COLA, RYAN TOLA, AND DOYLE ALLIANCE GROUP, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Ronald L. Buckwalter, S.J.
AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 2011, upon consideration of (1) Defendant Ryan Tola's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 60), the Response of Plaintiffs Brown & Brown, Inc., Brown & Brown of Pennsylvania, Inc., and Grinspec, Inc. (collectively "Plaintiffs") (Docket No. 75), Defendant Tola's Reply Brief (Docket No. 83), and Plaintiffs' Sur-reply Brief (Docket No. 91); and (2) Defendant Robert Cola's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 79) and Plaintiffs' Response (Docket No. 88), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motions are DENIED as follows:
1. Defendant Tola's request to dismiss the Lanham Act, and Defendant Cola's joinder in that request, are DENIED;
2. The remainder of both Defendant Tola's Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant Cola's Motion for Summary Judgment are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to re-filing upon the close of discovery.
It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
© 1992-2014 VersusLaw Inc.