IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
March 1, 2011
DET. SNEATH, ET AL., DEFENDANTS
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner
AND NOW, this 1st day of March, 2011, upon consideration of plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel (Doc. 75) and it appearing that the issues presented involve neither complex legal or factual issues nor require the testimony of expert witnesses, that plaintiff is capable of properly and forcefully prosecuting his claims, that discovery in the matter has concluded, the matter has been scheduled for trial and plaintiff has filed appropriate pre-trial motions, that, see Tabron v. Grace, 6F.3d 147, 155-57 (3d Cir. 1993) (listing factors relevant to request for counsel), it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. 75) is DENIED.
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.