IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
February 28, 2011
DAVID A. VARANO, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: C. Darnell Jones II, U.S.D.J.
AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 2011, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254; the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge L. Felipe Restrepo, and Petitioner's Objections thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED as time-barred.
3. A certificate of appealability should not issue because Petitioner has failed to show that a reasonable jurist could conclude that the Court is incorrect in dismissing the Petition as time-barred.
4. The Clerk of Court shall close this case for all purposes, including statistics.
BY THE COURT:
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.