Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Robert C. Elliott

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT


January 19, 2011

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PETITIONER
v.
ROBERT C. ELLIOTT, JR., RESPONDENT

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

Per curiam.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 19th day of January 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Whether the Superior Court's reliance on 42 Pa.C.S. §9754 in its holding in Commonwealth v. Vilsaint, 893 A.2d 753 (Pa. Super. 2006) and Commonwealth v. MacGregor, 912 A.2d 315 (Pa. Super. 2006) that only the court, and not probation officers, can impose the terms of probation is in conflict with 42 Pa.C.S. §9798.3, enacted in 2007, which directs that the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and County probation authorities in Megan's Law may impose supervision conditions that include offender tracking.

20110119

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.