IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
January 3, 2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Terrence F. McVerry United States District Judge
ORDER OF COURT
AND NOW, to-wit, this _______ day of January 2011, upon consideration of the foregoing Defendant Jeffrey Rubis' Motion to Extend Time for Filing Pretrial Motions, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that said motion be and the same hereby is, GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the extension of time caused by this continuance be deemed excludable delay under the Speedy Trial Act 18 U.S.C. § 3161 et seq. Specifically, the court finds that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant to a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), since, for the reasons stated in defendant's motion, the failure to grant such continuance would unreasonably deny counsel for the defendant reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any pretrial motions referred to in Local Criminal Rule 12 are due on or before February 2, 2011.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.