Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Arthur Alan Wolk, et al. v. Westport Insurance Corp.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


December 21, 2010

ARTHUR ALAN WOLK, ET AL.
v.
WESTPORT INSURANCE CORP.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Fullam, Sr. J.

MEMORANDUM

Plaintiffs have brought suit against their former professional liability insurer for failing to provide Plaintiffs with a defense when claims were allegedly asserted against Plaintiffs in a state court case. Plaintiffs have asserted a claim of bad faith pursuant to 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. § 8371, in connection with which Plaintiffs served a subpoena for documents from third-party respondent USI Insurance Services d/b/a Bertholon Rowland, Inc. ("USI"), the insurance broker for the policy at issue. USI objected to the subpoena and did not produce any documents, and Plaintiffs have now filed a motion to compel.

Plaintiffs' subpoena for documents requests information about other lawyers' reasons for selecting Defendant's policy, complaints lodged by other lawyers regarding the policy or USI's practices, and documents pertinent to Plaintiffs' particular policy. Plaintiffs argue that these documents are relevant to the claim of bad faith because they allegedly would demonstrate a continuing course of conduct by the defendant-insurer that would support a finding that the insurer had a "motive of self interest or ill-will" in denying Plaintiffs' claim.

I will deny the motion to compel. The bad faith statute looks to whether the insurer "acted recklessly or with ill will in a particular case, not whether its business practices are reasonable in general." Hyde Athletic Indus., Inc. v. Cont'l Cas. Co., 969 F. Supp. 289, 307 (E.D. Pa. 1997) (emphasis added). Information regarding other lawyers, in addition to implicating privacy concerns, is not relevant to the insurer's conduct in this case. As for the information regarding Plaintiffs' particular policy, USI has submitted a declaration stating that it does not have any responsive documents, as it did not underwrite Plaintiffs' policy.

An order will be entered.

BY THE COURT:

John P. Fullam, Sr. J.

20101221

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.